Herrera v. Wyoming
Herrera v. Wyoming, No. 17-532, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Wyoming's statehood did not void the Crow Tribe's right to hunt on "unoccupied lands of the United States" under an 1868 treaty, and that the Bighorn National Forest did not automatically become "occupied" when the forest was created.
| Herrera v. Wyoming | |
|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued January 8, 2019 Decided May 20, 2019 | |
| Full case name | Clayvin Herrera v. Wyoming |
| Docket no. | 17-532 |
| Citations | 587 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 1686; 203 L. Ed. 2d 846 |
| Decision | Opinion |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2707 (2018). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Gorsuch |
| Dissent | Alito, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
| Ward v. Race Horse (1896) | |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.