First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan

First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 22, 1995; Decided May 22, 1995
Full case name	First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Manuel Kaplan, et us. and MK Investments, Incorporated
Citations	514 U.S. 938 (more) 115 S. Ct. 1920; 131 L. Ed. 2d 985; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3463; 63 U.S.L.W. 4459; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 98,728; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 26,398; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3821; 95 Daily Journal DAR 6474; 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 64
Case history
Prior	On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Holding
	Judicial review of arbitrability of contract is properly permitted when parties have not clearly agreed that arbitrator will decide question
Court membership
	Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor; Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; David Souter · Clarence Thomas; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
Majority	Breyer, joined by unanimous

First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on who decides whether a dispute is subject to arbitration, the courts or an arbitrator.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.