Duane Arnold Energy Center

The Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) was Iowa's only nuclear power plant. It is located on a 500-acre (200 ha) site on the west bank of the Cedar River, two miles (3.2 km) north-northeast of Palo, Iowa, USA, or eight miles (13 km) northwest of Cedar Rapids.

Duane Arnold Energy Center
DAEC in winter
CountryUnited States
LocationFayette Township, Linn County, near Palo, Iowa
Coordinates42°6′2″N 91°46′38″W
StatusBeing decommissioned
Construction beganMay 22, 1970 (1970-05-22)
Commission dateFebruary 1, 1975
Decommission date
  • November 2020
Construction cost$1.165 billion (2007 USD)
Owner(s)
Operator(s)NextEra Energy Resources
Nuclear power station
Reactor typeBWR
Reactor supplierGeneral Electric
Cooling towers2 × Mechanical Draft
Cooling sourceCedar River
Thermal capacity1 × 1912 MWth
Power generation
Units operational1 × 601 MW
Make and modelBWR-4 (Mark 1)
Nameplate capacity601 MW
Capacity factor99.04% (2017)
78.3% (lifetime)
Annual net output5235 GWh (2021)
External links
WebsiteDuane Arnold Energy Center
CommonsRelated media on Commons

DAEC entered operation in February 1975. On August 10, 2020, the plant cooling towers were damaged during a derecho, and repairs were deemed uneconomical, as the plant had already been scheduled for decommissioning in October 2020.

The operator and majority owner is NextEra Energy Resources (70%). The Central Iowa Power Cooperative owns 20% and the Corn Belt Power Cooperative owns 10%.

In January 2018, NextEra Energy announced that it was unlikely that DAEC would operate beyond 2025. The plant was given a 20-year license extension to 2034 but considered closing after Alliant Energy, which contracts for 70% of the plant's electricity, announced it would instead be buying electricity from subsidized sources such as wind and natural gas. In July 2018 the expected closure date was amended to October 2020.

The unit permanently ceased making power on 10 August 2020, due to storm damage from the August 2020 Midwest derecho. An NRC report of the incident stated that "the vacuum drawn in secondary containment by the standby gas treatment system was slightly below the technical specification (TS) limit", indicating that the secondary containment system might not have been fully effective had it been challenged. Thus the incident was considered by nuclear safety experts to be "a close call".

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.