Doe v. Unocal Corp.
Doe v. Unocal, 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002), opinion vacated and rehearing en banc granted, 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003), was a lawsuit filed against Unocal for alleged human rights violations.
| Doe v. Unocal Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Full case name | John Doe v. Unocal Corporation et al |
| Decided | September 18, 2002 |
| Citation(s) | 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002) |
| Case history | |
| Prior history | 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal. 2000) |
| Subsequent history | Opinion vacated and rehearing en banc granted, 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003) Appeal dismissed and District Court opinion vacated, 403 F.3d 708 (9th Cir. 2005) |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, A. Wallace Tashima |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Pregerson, joined by Tashima |
| Concurrence | Reinhardt |
| Laws applied | |
| Alien Tort Statute | |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.